NL EN
Werken bij

Waarmee kunnen wij u helpen?

Johan Boeren

Partner, Advocaat

Johan is een zeer ervaren specialist op het gebied van het ondernemings- en huurrecht.

Helder en bondig. Direct.

Hij heeft ruime ervaring in het begeleiden van fusies, overnames, joint ventures en reorganisaties voor Nederlandse en buitenlandse cliënten in diverse (gereguleerde) marksectoren. Johan beschikt daarnaast over uitgebreide expertise op het gebied van het huurrecht.

Aanbevelingen

"Clients praise the firm's 'excellent knowledge'" - Chambers Europe and Chambers Global 2020, Corporate/M&A: Mid-Market

Leading firm - The Legal 500 2020, Private Equity

"Good quality combination of all round lawyers and specialists, very pleasant to work with, strong client focus – they know us and make an extra effort to learn about the market" - The Legal 500 2020, Corporate and M&A

"Excellent service" - The Legal 500 2020, Corporate and M&A

"Personal, pragmatic advice. The firm genuinely cares about its client and invests the time to get to know them" - IFLR1000 2020, M&A

"Demonstrates particular expertise representing senior management boards of target companies in private equity buyouts" - Chambers Europe and Chambers Global 2020, Corporate/M&A: Mid-Market

"Pleasant and agile to deal with" - IFLR1000 2020, M&A

“Good mix between the experience and knowledge of the ‘old hands’ and the eagerness and new views of the ‘new gang’. Solid and balanced service and advice at good rates.” The Legal 500 2020 - Real Estate

"The team is efficient, very experienced and able to adapt to different circumstances or counter parties. They are always looking for a practical solution for all parties involved"

"The real estate team at Van Doorne is very knowledgeable and able to adapt to different (difficult) counter parties" - The Legal 500 2020, Real Estate

Meer van Johan Boeren

Naar kennisbank

No Works Council consultation rights in case of a restart following a 'technical' bankruptcy

On 23 December 2015 DA Retailgroep B.V. ('DA') was granted a moratorium of payments (surséance van betaling). Immediately after, its court-appointed administrator (bewindvoerder) engaged in third party negotiations to explore a possible sale and restart of its business.

Withdrawal of remaining joint and several liability of former holding companies

11 januari 2016

One of the conditions for the application of the annual accounts group exemption as provided for by section 2:403 DCC, exempting a group company (the Exempted Company), inter alia, from the obligation to publish its own annual accounts, is that the group company (Holding) consolidating the Exempted Company's accounts assumes joint and several liability arising from legal acts entered into by the Exempted Company (403-statement).

Two important Dutch Supreme Court judgements On joint and several liability of partners of Dutch general and limited partnerships

The partners of a Dutch general partnership (vennootschap onder firma) and the general partners (beherend vennoten) of a Dutch limited partnership (commanditaire vennootschap) are jointly and severally liable (hoofdelijk aansprakelijk) for the obligations of the partnership.

Van Doorne adviseert beursgenoteerde Westport

05 januari 2015

Het Canadese bedrijf Westport Innovations is onlangs eigenaar geworden van Prins Autogassystemen. De Prins groep is een marktleider op het gebied van het ontwikkelen van alternatieve brandstofsystemen.

Civil law ban to act as a director

17 oktober 2014

Under a new legislative proposal which was recently submitted to parliament, a mala fide director may be banned as a managing or supervisory director of any Dutch legal entity for a period of up to 5 years by means of a civil law disqualification as director (civielrechteliik bestuursverbod) as imposed by the Court. The proposal aims to improve the fight against bankruptcy fraud and pre-bankruptcy mismanagement and provides for an amendment of the Dutch Bankruptcy Act

Interpretation of non-assignment clauses

On March 21, 2014 the Dutch Supreme Court rendered an important judgment regarding the interpretation of non-assignment clauses (RvdW 2014/495, Coface/Intergamma).

Failed attempt to set aside transfer restriction clauses in articles of association

24 januari 2014

The Dutch court has recently passed a first judgment on the basis of section 2:195 par. 7 of the Dutch Civil Code (District Court Midden-Nederland, October 16, 2013).

The (ir)relevance of an entire agreement clause

As a standing rule for the interpretation of contracts under Dutch law, the meaning which both parties may, under the relevant circumstances at stake, reasonably give to a certain provision and what they may reasonably expect from each other in respect thereof shall be decisive (the Dutch Supreme Court in its famous Haviltex judgment of 1981).